Navigation – Plan du site
Inaugural Lectures

Examples and Future of a Millennial History

Jean-Marie Tarascon
p. 12
Cet article est une traduction de :
Exemples et futur d’une histoire millénaire

Notes de la rédaction

Excerpts from the Inaugural Lecture 23 January 2014
Source: La lettre, no. 38, June 2014

Texte intégral

Baghdad battery, sketch of the three pieces

© Ironie

1The development of humanity has always been linked to that of materials. This premise is constantly being confirmed today, since emerging technology is still reliant on chemistry’s sometimes capricious ability to supply more efficient materials which are better suited to the additional constraints imposed on them.

2In this context, the “solid-state chemistry – energy” pairing is crucial to meeting the fundamental and applied challenges surrounding energy transition.

3For thousands of years solid-state chemistry was used as a series of recipes, similar to those found in culinary art. Over time and following nineteenth-century scientific discoveries, it became a real science of matter and its transformations. Through experiments, chemists were able to reveal the secrets of matter and to understand it better, in order to transform it rationally to create materials with the functionalities relevant to energy.

4Judging from the Baghdad battery, the “solid-state chemistry – energy” coupling already existed in Antiquity. Erstwhile potters moreover knew how to turn an ordinary mix of clay and water into beautiful pottery, and foundry-men knew how to obtain metals. Thus, over the centuries, the Stone Age led to the Copper Age, then to the Bronze and the Iron Ages. Note also that the first artificial pigment, Egyptian blue, was synthesized 5,000 years BCE. None of these craftsmen knew the chemical reactions involved in these transformations but they operated with reliable recipes whose science they did not understand.

5The shift from know-how to a science governed by scientific laws was not made easier by alchemists, whose overriding intention was to transform metals into gold by combining four elements: fire, air, earth, and water. It took over 2,000 years to shift from these four combined elements to the thirty-three elements proposed in 1789 by Lavoisier – who is considered de facto as the father of modern chemistry. His work triggered an effervescence of all aspects of chemistry, at a time when it would benefit from the great nineteenth-century discoveries (particularly the X-ray by Röntgen and atomic theory, developed by Planck and Schrödinger).

6All these discoveries contributed to the revival of solid-state chemistry in the early 1950s. This new expansion was also fuelled by the strong interactions that had developed with solid-state physicists and an industrial context highly conducive to the creation of innovative materials. Solid-state chemistry thus became a science, based on the relationship between properties and structures, which could be used to develop new materials with specific functionalities.

7Once these foundations were established, solid-state chemists used their main tool, the periodic table, to choose the right elements to control chemical bonding, compose its partition and design new composites, or adjust their physical-chemical properties on demand. Thus, through cationic/anionic substitution, they were able to orient the electronic and ionic conduction properties of materials, their optical properties, their colours, their magnetic properties, and even their energy storage properties, so as to turn them into materials valued highly in industry.

8This soft chemistry thus revolutionized our approaches to synthesis, allowing not only for the stabilization of new phases but also for the modification of their morphology, so that they could be used as a third dimension (in addition to temperature and pressure). This, in turn, would allow for the optimal orientation of the performance of the materials obtained. “Optimal”, as this science can sometimes find itself at the crossroads of the foreseen and the unforeseen, which is what makes it appealing to chemists.

9Given the limited time we have to address energy issues, the chemist’s intuition and ability to assemble atoms and create composites are no longer sufficient to exploit rapidly the full wealth of the periodic table. Thousands of combinations are possible. Much hope is therefore put in the ability of rational combinatorial theoretical chemistry to imitate, with materials, the processes that occur in the genome.

• A video of the Lecture can be found at www.college-de-france.fr, on the professors page.

Haut de page

Table des illustrations

Légende Baghdad battery, sketch of the three pieces
URL http://lettre-cdf.revues.org/docannexe/image/2147/img-1.png
Fichier image/png, 247k
Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence électronique

Jean-Marie Tarascon, « Examples and Future of a Millennial History », La lettre du Collège de France [En ligne], 9 | 2015, mis en ligne le 25 septembre 2015, consulté le 20 août 2017. URL : http://lettre-cdf.revues.org/2147

Haut de page

Auteur

Jean-Marie Tarascon

Chemistry of Materials and Energy

Articles du même auteur

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

© Collège de France

Haut de page