Navigation – Plan du site
Chairs

Philosophical Aspects of Form

Benoit Gaultier, Jean-Marie Chevalier et Claudine Tiercelin
p. 38
Cet article est une traduction de :
La forme, enjeux philosophiques

Notes de la rédaction

Source: La lettre, no. 36, May 2013

Texte intégral

Wild Mood Swings, 2009-2010 © Tim Noble & Sue Webster. Images courtesy of the artists.

1On 17 and 18 January, Professor Claudine Tiercelin, Chair of Metaphysics and Philosophy of Knowledge, organized a seminar on philosophical aspects of the concept of form, a concept which has given rise to many questions since at least as early as the opposition between Plato’s eidos and Aristotle’s morphe.

2Whether form is understood as separate from worldly beings or as immanent to substance, it is traditionally distinguished from matter by philosophers. And just as the sciences do not easily lend themselves to the singular, so too is matter ill-suited to discourse and theory. Hence, most of the time, form bears the bulk of the theoretical load: it must account for the ideality of essences, the reality of properties, the unity of substance, individuation, and the unification of the diversity of perception, without forgetting the rigour of demonstrations and the beauty of appearances. The seminar was devoted to clarifying these problems, in their metaphysical and scientific dimensions – questioning the relevance­ of the concept of form in biology, the role of dispositions in con­temporary physics, the power of mathematical and logical formalism or the scope of Aristotelian hylomorphism – and to tracing the phenome­nality of form from its roots in Gestaltpsychologie to cognitive science and aesthetic perception. Do self-organization and complexity render the idea of form obsolete? Are forms in the world structures, dispositions? What constitutes the strength of a line of reasoning which seems evident to us solely by virtue of its formalism? What does it mean to (re)cognize a form, to appreciate it, to find it beautiful? Does form has precedence over content? Does it play a role in structuring our experience?

3After Claudine Tiercelin opened the seminar, Jean-Marie Chevalier (Collège de France) considered the extent to which logic affords an intellection of the world by virtue of a homo­logy of logical and metaphysical forms. Amirouche Moktefi (IRIST) then explained how and why many formal languages elaborated throughout the nineteenth century were subsequently grad­ually abandoned. Benoit Gaultier (Collège de France) presented and discussed Peirce and Wittgenstein’s theory that any mathematical demonstration necessarily has an iconic dimension. Sandrine Darsel (AHP Nancy) ended the first afternoon of the seminar­ by discussing the need to grasp such a thing as a mu­sical form in order to understand adequately a piece of music. The next morning­ was devoted to the metaphysics and philosophy of science, with presen­tations by Michael Esfeld (Université de Lausanne), who rigorously defended the idea that the laws of nature are its form, and Anouk Barberousse (Université de Lille 1), who considered the richness of the concept of organic form in biology, particularly through d’Arcy Thompson’s and Stuart Kauffman’s per­spectives. The seminar resumed for a second afternoon with Alain de Libera’s paper (EPHE), devoted to the important distinction between assistant and inherent forms in the work of medieval philosophers and theologians. Guillaume Fréchette (Université de Salzbourg) then defended the existence of an Austrian phenomeno­logical tradition, exemplified by Ehrenfels and Meinong in particular, which holds the nature of the qualities­ of form as one of its key concerns. Jérôme Dokic (EHESS) closed this second day by identifying the properties thanks to which, in perception, a form is meaningful from a cognitive point of view and can therefore be called a “good form”.

4The seminar Philosophical Aspects of Form should thus have enabled the Collège de France’s audience to become familiar with current research on these particularly stimulating issues. This is especially true for students preparing their agrégation in philosophy, since form was precisely one of the topics of the 2013 examination.

Videos of papers delivered at the seminar are available on www.college-de-france.fr, on the professor’s page.

Haut de page

Table des illustrations

Légende Wild Mood Swings, 2009-2010 © Tim Noble & Sue Webster. Images courtesy of the artists.
URL http://lettre-cdf.revues.org/docannexe/image/2013/img-1.png
Fichier image/png, 1,1M
Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence électronique

Benoit Gaultier, Jean-Marie Chevalier et Claudine Tiercelin, « Philosophical Aspects of Form », La lettre du Collège de France [En ligne], 8 | mars 2014, mis en ligne le 11 août 2015, consulté le 24 avril 2017. URL : http://lettre-cdf.revues.org/2013

Haut de page

Auteurs

Claudine Tiercelin

Metaphysics and Philosophy of Knowledge

Articles du même auteur

Benoit Gaultier

Articles du même auteur

Jean-Marie Chevalier

Articles du même auteur

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

© Collège de France

Haut de page